Erfan Fard
In the intricate landscape of Middle Eastern geopolitics, Hezbollah, a terrorist Shia political and military organization based in Lebanon, holds significant influence. Among its unwavering stances is a vehement opposition to the normalization of relations between Israel and several Arab nations, Saudi Arabia included. To comprehend the motivations behind Hezbollah’s unwavering opposition, one must delve into the historical, ideological, and geopolitical factors that underpin this steadfast resistance.
Hezbollah emerged in the early 1980s in response to the Israeli invasion of Lebanon. Evolving over the years, it has become a multifaceted terrorist organization with both political and military wings, deeply ingrained in Lebanon’s socio-political fabric. At its core, Hezbollah aligns itself with the Palestinian cause, viewing their struggle against Israeli as a fundamental aspect of its ideology.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is deeply entrenched, with roots stretching back to the mid-20th century. The establishment of Israel in 1948, exacerbating tensions. Hezbollah sees itself as an integral part of the broader movement in the region that opposes Israel, advocating for the Palestinians.
Hassan Nasrallah, as the terrorist Secretary General of Hezbollah, staunchly condemns any country seeking to normalize relations with Israel, Saudi Arabia being no exception. From his malign perspective, such normalization is a betrayal of Palestine and an act that strengthens the perceived enemy—an act that Nasrallah and Hezbollah vehemently oppose under any circumstances. This opposition is deeply rooted in the vicious history and ideology to put fuel in the conflict. Hezbollah, a so-called staunch supporter of the labyrinthic Palestinian cause, advocates for the Palestine and opposes any recognition or normalization of relations with Israel until the Palestinian issue is adequately resolved. In essence, a terrorist entity is against any peace.
Furthermore, Nasrallah perceives Saudi Arabia, a prominent Arab state, normalizing relations with Israel as “a betrayal of broader Arab and Muslim solidarity against what they perceive as Israeli occupation and oppression of Palestinians”. This standpoint aligns with Hezbollah’s destructive ideology of resistance and opposition to Israel.
It’s essential to understand that Hezbollah, from its inception, has positioned itself as a key player in resisting Israeli influence and expansion in the region. Nasrallah’s opposition to normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel is a continuation of this narrative, emphasizing their dedication to the Palestinian cause and their resistance against any form of normalization with what they see as an occupying force.
Historically, Hezbollah has engaged in armed conflict with Israel, notably during the 2006 Lebanon War, further solidifying their opposition to any engagement that might legitimize Israel in the eyes of the international community. They argue that such normalization efforts undermine the historical struggles and sacrifices made in the pursuit of Palestinian self-determination.
The terrorist organization of Hezbollah also views normalization as a tactic by Israel to fracture the unified front of Arab nations against it. They perceive it as a strategic move to isolate the Palestinians, weakening their cause in the eyes of the international community. This viewpoint is deeply ingrained in Hezbollah’s belief system, fueling their resistance against any normalization efforts.
Furthermore, Hezbollah’s support comes from terrorist loving mullahs in Iran, a nation vehemently opposing Israel’s existence. Iranian regime’s backing of Hezbollah aligns with its own strategic interests in the region, providing a powerful ally in its anti-Israel agenda. The ideological underpinnings of Iran’s Islamic Revolution – or khomeinism- profoundly influence Hezbollah’s stance on Israel, further bolstering the organization’s unwavering resistance against normalization.
In conclusion, Hezbollah’s opposition to the normalization of relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia stems from a complex interplay of historical, ideological, and geopolitical factors. It is deeply rooted in their solidarity with the Palestinian cause, their obstreperous resistance against Israel, and their commitment to maintaining a unified Arab and Muslim front against perceived oppressors. Understanding Hezbollah’s perspective is crucial for comprehending the dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the broader geopolitical landscape of the Middle East. Factually, in the lexicon of mullah’s book, “Islamic resistance” means “Islamic Terrorism”.
In the tumultuous world of the Middle East, Hezbollah, or the “Party of God,” emerged from the crucible of the Israeli invasion of southern Lebanon in 1982 as a formidable force. This terrorist Shia militia, nurtured and backed by mullah’s regime in Iran, swiftly gained a reputation for being a fierce guerrilla force that would stop at nothing to achieve its objectives.
At the helm of this organization stood Hassan Nasrallah, a terrorist leader whose vision and determination propelled Hezbollah into the global spotlight. Their initial goal was to expel Israeli forces from southern Lebanon, and despite Israel’s withdrawal in 2000, Hezbollah continued its armed struggle, leveraging disputed regions like the Sheb’a Farms to persistently clash with Israel.
However, Hezbollah’s ambitions were not confined to the borders of Lebanon. Their reach extended far beyond, establishing an intricate criminal-financial network that spanned Europe, Africa, and Latin America. Involved in illegal drug trade, arms trafficking, and money laundering, Hezbollah funded its activities and strengthened its grip on both local and international scales. Hezbollah was more than a mere terrorist militia; it had become a transnational entity with a global agenda.
Their activities were as diverse as they were sinister. From drug trafficking to money laundering, from arms smuggling to cybercrime, Hezbollah was deeply entrenched in criminal enterprises, exploiting the vulnerabilities of various countries, and leveraging corrupt networks.
The group was also notorious for its involvement in global terrorism. Their attacks targeted not only Israeli interests but also entities perceived as enemies of their cause. From the bombing of the U.S. Embassy and Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983 to hijacking TWA Flight 847, they displayed a complete disregard for human life.
Iranian regime’s support was instrumental in fueling Hezbollah’s terrorist operations. The mullah’s regime in Iran provided not only financial assistance but also shared ideological beliefs. The alliance with Iran fortified Hezbollah’s resolve, making them a formidable player in the region and beyond.
Hezbollah’s global footprint posed a significant threat to international peace and security. Governments and organizations around the world were forced to confront this menace and develop strategies to counter its influence. The fight against Hezbollah was not just a battle on Lebanese soil; it was a struggle against a network of menace that reached into every corner of the world.
In the end, the world realized that to defeat the terrorists of Hezbollah, unity and collaboration were paramount. The international community stood shoulder to shoulder, sharing intelligence, coordinating actions, and implementing sanctions to cut off their financial lifelines. The story of Hezbollah serves as a reminder that the fight against terror is a collective effort, a battle that requires unwavering determination and global solidarity. Only by facing this challenge together can we hope to secure a safer future for all.
Hassan Nasrallah’s track record, including associations with missile courses in North Korea and close ties with terrorists within the Islamic Republic of mullahs, extinguishes any hope for him to contribute to peace and stability in Lebanon. His influence represents a perilous obstacle to the peaceful aspirations of the Palestinian people. To truly attain peace, it is imperative that Palestinians are not utilized as pawns by the Islamic Republic of Mullahs. The younger generation of Palestinians is eager to move away from a path of terrorism, aspiring instead to pursue education in modern sciences and technology within the prominent universities of Israel.
Hezbollah’s existence may endure as long as the Islamic Republic of criminal Shia mullahs stands, but its fate appears bleak once the oppressive Mullah regime in Tehran collapses. Currently, the hard-earned money of the Iranian populace is misappropriated by these criminal mullahs to finance Hezbollah’s acts of terrorism. However, following a regime shift towards a national government, the abhorrent practice of funding terrorists will undoubtedly cease. Through these tumultuous times, the Iranian people are likely to cultivate a more amicable relationship with Israel.