Erfan Fard
The international community faces a persistent and grave concern in the form of the genocidal cult of Islamo-Nazism. Originating from the Iranian Islamic terrorist Revolt, this extremist ideology poses a significant threat to regional stability and global security.
It is essential to recognize these extremist ideologies and their aggressive aspirations, with a focus on Western powers’ involvement, notably the United States. It concludes with a call to action for a unified international response to counter these threats and uphold global peace and security.
Delayed Recognition of Extremist Ideologies:
Nowadays, The USA has no desire or intention to become involved in any war or future hostilities with Iran’s regime. Only a lunatic loser seeks to provoke conflict who’s the Supreme Leader of Islamic Terrorists in the globe.
The emergence of Islamo-Nazism was not an overnight development. In retrospect, it becomes evident that the world awoke to the danger too late. Khomeini’s 1969 book, ‘Velayat-e Faqih,’ was published in Beirut and reprinted over 30 times. While this text remained obscure to many, it was a critical precursor to the cataclysmic events of 1979. Perhaps only Mossad having read a copy. Western intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA, failed to accurately assess the implications of Khomeini’s writings, leading to a profound miscalculation of the Islamic Terrorist Revolt in Iran.
The Puppet Show of the Islamic Terrorist Revolt:
The Islamic-Marxist Revolt in Iran was, in essence, a calculated manipulation. In other words, it was a psychological war and a cerebral wash. It was not just a spontaneous event but a result of strategic planning that transpired behind closed doors. The utilization of the Islamic card in 1979 was part of a broader geopolitical landscape, occurring a decade prior to the collapse of communism.
The Iranian Revolt caught Western powers off guard, as the Kremlin initially appeared content with the rise of Khomeini and the trained terrorists in Palestinian camps. This historical oversight allowed the regime to consolidate power. Today, the former Colonel of KGB is pleased with ‘The Triumph of Islam’.
Western Inaction and the Role of the U.S.:
Western governments, particularly the United States, displayed a surprising lack of awareness regarding the menace posed by religious fascism, destructive ideologies, and the violent mindset of Khomeini.
Notably, the U.S. State Department and the CIA were ill-equipped to comprehend the implications of Khomeini’s mystical writings and were influenced by misleading information from Khomeini’s circle, such as Yazdi, Beheshti, Bani Sadr, and Ghobzadeh, who portrayed him as a gentle and moderate figure.
The Consequences of Western Indifference:
The Carter administration’s indifference to the overthrow of the late Shah, a longstanding ally of the U.S. and the Western world, had far-reaching consequences. They underestimated Khomeini’s propaganda and his ascent to power. This lack of recognition allowed extremist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood to throw their weight behind Khomeini and Khamenei, fostering the growth of Islamic terrorism. Around 200,000 mullahs in 25,000 terrifying mosques and religious schools were involved in breeding this vicious ideology. The Iranian revolt marked the beginning of a turbulent era or Dark Age in the Middle East.
The Catastrophic Turn of Events:
Factually, it is undeniable that President Carter bears fundamental responsibility for the events of 1979. His administration, instead of recognizing the dangers, embraced Khomeini as a holy figure, turning a blind eye to the rise of Islamic terrorism in the region. Despite warnings, the Carters chose to ignore the harsh reality and opted for inaction. Carter’s main response to Khomeini’s wickedness was to pray and say ‘Amen’ in front of the camera.”
The Words of Ronald Reagan:
President Ronald Reagan, in a 1984 televised statement, described the U.S. undercutting the Shah as a great humiliation in American history. He condemned the transition of power to a fanatical mullah responsible for the execution of thousands. Alexander Haig also acknowledged the U.S.’s role in the Shah’s downfall, turning Iran into a historical graveyard.
Conclusion:
In the era of President Carter, he pursued an alliance with Khomeini despite making erroneous calculations, endorsing delusional policies, and displaying shortsightedness. The consequences of this decision were far-reaching. As the late Shah succinctly put it in an interview with The Washington Post on June 22, 1980, “A terrorist, assassin, and criminal have become the leader of a civilized country.” Regrettably, President Carter failed to heed the Shah’s prescient warning. Subsequent U.S. administrations, including the tenures of Presidents Obama and Biden, adopted a similar approach, marking a distressing chapter in American foreign policy.
It’s possible that the plan to overthrow the Shah still lingers in Carter’s thoughts and continues to weigh on his conscience. The U.S. State Department, seemingly unaware, appeared to harbor sympathy for Islamic leftists (now referred to as reformists). History will note that the Democratic Party was inclined to transform the image of a savage and uncivilized mullah into that of “a holy man”. However, Carter was not the sole figure in this endeavor. Andrew Young, the U.S. representative to the United Nations, openly extolled Khomeini in front of the press, hailing him as a ‘Saint.’ This act left the White House astounded (The New York Times, June 4, 1989).
Carter’s warm embrace of Khomeini served as a defining moment of our era. Khomeini, who adopted the title ‘Islam,’ now sees himself as a champion of Islam, while more than 144 self-proclaimed ‘Commanders of the Faithful’ have risen and fallen throughout the history of Islam.
Surprisingly, Biden has shown no interest in reading the Mullah’s book. The incident in question took place on May 2, 2022, during President Biden’s speech at a reception celebrating Eid al-Fitr. He mentioned, “I didn’t grasp the concept of the hidden Imam—my apologies, I—so I sought guidance and collaborated with a distinguished professor of Islamic studies.” In actuality, the hidden Imam is a theological concept within Shia Islam and doesn’t have a tangible, external presence; it is rooted in Shia religious history.
During the Safavid era (1501-1736) and the Qajar era (1789-1925), Shia clerics aligned themselves with corrupt and tyrannical rulers, contending that the ruling power belonged to the contemporary Imam but was entrusted to the king. This narrative served their self-interest. However, Khomeini strategically introduced a different perspective in his writings, asserting that a jurist acts as the representative of the Imam of the time. Even today, the Islamic theocratic regime of Velayat al-Faqih claims to be a pseudo-representative of Imam Zaman, maintaining their authority until an alleged reappearance. This ideology represents a fusion of dogmatism, cunning, and absolute tyranny. Regrettably, proponents of Khomeini, such as the terrorists of Fadā’iyān-e Islam, violently targeted intellectuals like Ahmad Kasravi, who dared to label this contemporary Imam as counterfeit (March 11, 1946).
In conclusion, the events surrounding Iran’s Islamic Terrorist Revolt and its aftermath have had profound implications for the region and the world. The emergence of the genocidal cult of Islamo-Nazism, as discussed above, is a grave concern that must not be underestimated. The failure of the international community to fully comprehend the extremist and destructive ideologies of Khomeini and Khamenei, coupled with their violent aspirations, played a pivotal role in shaping the contemporary Middle East.
The hesitance, miscalculations, and shortsighted policies of Western powers, particularly the United States, in the face of the Iranian revolution and its consequences, have had far-reaching consequences. The catastrophic 1979 takeover, which resulted in the rise of an inhumane and anti-human regime, continues to threaten regional security and global stability.
It is imperative that the international community acknowledges the dangers posed by this ideology and takes decisive action against it. The world must not remain silent in the face of the blatant anti-Semitism and violence espoused by Iran’s leadership. As history has shown, timely and informed action is crucial. The Middle East’s stability and global peace are at stake, and nations must unite to counter the forces perpetuating violence in the name of religion. Only through collective efforts can we address this genocidal ideology and preserve peace and security in the region and the world.